FOR
RELEASE: 12:01 AM THURS., NOV. 7, 2002
Bob Weiner 301-283-0821
MAJOR TOBACCO CASE AGAINST
PHILIP MORRIS AND REYNOLDS
TO BEGIN IN SACRAMENTO 10
AM THURSDAY;
BOTH TO BE CHALLENGED FOR
52-YEAR-OLD’S LUNG AND BRAIN CANCER
BY ATTORNEYS MARY ALEXANDER
AND GARY PAUL
PHILIP MORRIS AND RJR
IN SAME COURT
DESPITE RJR’S REFUSAL
TO AGREE KNEW ADDICTIVE
10 AM THURS., NOV. 7, SUPERIOR
COURT, DEPT. 1, 720 9TH
ST, SACRAMENTO, CA (Open to Public)
(Sacramento,
CA) -- A major tobacco case begins today (opening arguments
Thursday, November 7, 10:00 AM) in Sacramento. In California’s
Superior Court (Dept. T, 720 9th
Street, open to the public), Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco will
be in the same courtroom “despite RJR’s refusal so far to agree with Philip
Morris’s recent admission that the industry knew but kept secret that smoking
is addictive,” according to consumer attorneys Mary Alexander of San Francisco
and Gary Paul of Santa Monica.
Both Philip
Morris and R.J. Reynolds will be challenged for 52-year-old Larry Lucier’s
lung cancer from smoking, which has metastasized to his brain.
Alexander and Paul state that Lucier, who is married and has a seven year-old
daughter, “will die prematurely; he has less than a 2% chance of living
another five years.”
Alexander
and Paul state that Philip Morris and RJR, “along with the other cigarette
manufacturers, have, over the course of decades, misrepresented, concealed,
suppressed, and failed to disclose information known to them concerning
the addictive and harmful properties of their product. The
defendants have affirmatively misled the American public.”
Plaintiffs Laurence Lucier and his wife, Laurie Lucier, “seek to hold Defendants
Philip Morris and RJR responsible for the consequences of their decades-long
fraud.”
Alexander
and Paul argue that “Philip Morris and RJR knew that cigarettes kill, but
that if the word ever got out, they would lose billions of dollars.
They moreover manipulated chemicals and nicotine levels in the cigarettes
so that they would be even more addictive. We expect that at
trial’s end, the jury will properly return a verdict against Philip Morris
and RJR and will rightly award substantial sums to the plaintiff.
This case has broad, industry-wide implications.” The trial
is expected to last six weeks.
(Source: Robert Weiner
Associates and Mary Alexander & Associates 301-283-0821)